The Getting-Things-Done President

Is GTD any way to run a country?

There’s a sense among progressives—based on Obama’s record so far and coagulating around the compromises being made in health care reform negotiations—that the judgments Obama is making aren’t squaring with the kind of president he said he’d be. Progressive discontent is now just simmering, partially because Obama is still Obama, but he seems to be giving them every opportunity to boil over.

That’s because it looks like Obama is having a checklist presidency. Yes, his agenda is being passed, but much of it feels compromised. The president appears to be delegating far too many details to Congress in order to keep Getting Things Done.

The Getting-Things-Done President | The Big Money.

Lost in the Weed

We stopped subsidizing tobacco farming. The result? Tobacco farming’s on the rise.

Normally I like to do a little intro, but I think this story speaks for itself. Here’s the first graf, please click through to read the rest of the story on how tobacco companies are getting their way with our government.

When President Obama signed legislation in mid-June to bring tobacco under FDA regulation, few seemed outraged that the legislation had been co-written by Philip Morris USA (PM). The bill was designed, critics say, to stabilize the place of cigarettes in our society: to diminish the threat of health-related lawsuits, to prevent competitive yet possibly safer products from being introduced, and to lock in Philip Morris’ market share. It’s not just the Harvard School of Public Health leveling these charges but even Sen. Bob Bennett, Republican of Utah, a supporter of the intent of the bill who was nonetheless “convinced we would do better if we told Philip Morris to stay out of the process of writing tobacco legislation.”

Lost in the Weed | The Big Money.

Cool, Refreshing Legislation for Philip Morris: Why it’s politically impossible to ban menthol cigarettes, even if they’re the most addictive.

A Cool, Refreshing, Death Sentence

It’s a sad state of affairs when the company selling the product you’re trying to regulate is writing the regulations, but tht’s exactly what’s happening in Congress right now with Philip Morris. As I write:

“It is a dream come true for Philip Morris,” Michael Siegel, a professor at the Boston University School of Public Health, told me. “First, they make it look like they are a reformed company which really cares about reducing the toll of cigarettes and protecting the public’s health; and second, they protect their domination of the market and make it impossible for potentially competitive products to enter the market.” Other tobacco companies have taken to calling the bill the “Marlboro Monopoly Act of 2009.”

Please give this story a read– it’s important, and a reminder to stay vigilant about our government, no matter who is in power.

Cool, Refreshing Legislation for Philip Morris: Why it’s politically impossible to ban menthol cigarettes, even if they’re the most addictive.

Lost Decade? We Just Had One | The Big Money

The Lost Decade graphicI wrote a story in The Big Money today talking about this idea of a “Lost Decade.” If you’ve noticed this meme in the news, you’ll know it comes from the idea that Japan, who had their own credit and housing crisis in the early 90s, so mismanaged their response that they suffered from a lost decade of economic stagnation.


Everywhere I turn today, people are talking about staving off an American lost decade. But, if you just look at the end result of the past ten years, didn’t we already have one? And might it not help our own bailout efforts to acknowledge this fact? I think so:


Lost Decade? We Just Had One | The Big Money.

One Liquor License, Three Transfers, Who Cares?

So today Grub Street, New York magazine's food blog, had a cute little success story about GalleryBar's ability to score a liquor license thanks to some tricky manipulations by the landlord. Apparently the landlord evicted 13 Little Devils, a bar, but somehow retained the liquor license that 13 L.D. got from the New York State Liquor Authority.

 Problem #1: 13 Little Devils' License was subject to a complaint from Community Board 3, because the license was granted without even so much as one meeting with the board, which has to approve EVERY license application, in theory, before the state actually grants the license.

 Problem #2: The landlord kicks out 13 Little Devils and creates a new entity, 120 Orchard LLC, which retains possession of the liquor license. Huh? Again, the board should be voting on this transfer. Now the people who got the license originally have absolutely zip to do with whoever is operating with it.

Problem #3: GalleryBar rents the space from the landlord, and in some arrangement or deal, now uses the license that belongs to 120 Orchard LLC, which, in all likelihood, the actual operators of the GalleryBar NEVER applied for.

 Problem #4: The Community Board voted yes to approve license transfers and modifications to the transferred 120 Orchard LLC license, apparently ignorant of the fact that the license was ill-gotten. So any case for the license being obtained without proper oversight goes right out the window.

Look– GalleryBar sounds like a cool place. But why couldn't the license have been gotten the right way? I hate to say the "system is screwed up, man," but it sort of is. Liquor licenses are getting passed around like the town bicycle these days. And eventually the people who originally got them are just gone, and if the point of a license is regulate the type of people and business selling liquor (no crimes, no tax problems, no weird business loans), then what's the point of letting a license change hands without any sort of oversight?

How to Score a Lower Eastpacking District Liquor License - Grub Street - New York Magazine

From the Desk of Midge Plampton, Head Secretary for Speaker Dennis Hastert

Dear Assistant Secretaries: 

As you may know, our boss, Big Denny, is in a bit of pickle these days, what with all this Mark Foley business. I thought this might be a good time to review our filing procedures for office notes and memoranda. 
Please note the following guidlines:
 
  • Denny's Chat Logs (screen name WrestlecOAcH) are NOT to be archived for any reason).
  • Please continue to postdate all files by 9 months to a year. This means any notes or meetings the Speaker had from last Spring should not be dated any earlier than "last weekend" and at the latest "yesterday."
  • Please continue to keep the Iraq file folder in the Al-Qaeda section of the cabinet.
  • At no time should assistant secretaries "strip down and get relaxed" during filing duties.
  • File all correspondence from screen name maf54 under "Dirty Tricks, Democratic"
  • Please relabel and refile the folder marked "October Surprise" as "Attempts, Last Ditch."
  • Be sure to refile all documents from the Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus Chairman under both "Hypocrisy" and "Service, Lip."
  • Refile "pedophilia" as "pedophilia, not."
  • We've noticed that the "Corruption, Internal" file has been growing quite large. Please sort through these files and, where appropriate, refile under "Dirty Tricks, Democratic."
  • We notice this may make the "Dirty Tricks, Democratic" file also quite large, what with the maf54 correspondence in it. So, please split the file into "democrats, chat logs we claim were faked by" and "made, mistakes."
  • Go ahead and throw away the empty folders in the cabinet, especially "learned, lessons," "conscience, guilty" and "plans for, GOP 2006 Congressional majority."
Thank you for your attention to these guidelines.
Midge

Who is Borhane B Cherif? A Carne Vale / “Carthage Palace” Followup

According to the court documents, Borhane B Cherif is the president of a company, Carthage Palace, that declared bankruptcy in 2004.

According to the New York State Liquor Authority, Cherif is the current license holder at Carthage Palace, a business operating at 46 Avenue B in Manhattan.

These facts, however, do not check out with the reality on the ground. 

Upon visiting 46 Avenue B, one finds no Carthage Palace. Instead, one finds Carne Vale, a restaurant and nightclub that is known to be owned and operated by two brothers, Markus and Sameh Jacob (or Yacob). Eater has covered this restaurant, its sister restaurant Le Souk, and the misadventures of their clientele. I wrote my piece on the businesses after witnessing the fly by night opening of Carne Vale, which seemed impossible given the bar crackdown taking place in Alphabet City.

According to the State Liquor Authority's website, the license for 46 Avenue B is still in possession of Carthage Palace and Cherif. There is no "trade name" on the license, which is used in cases where a company's legal name differs from the name used to promote the business. Yet August 3rd, 2006, Carthage Palace applied for a license renewal, which was granted, extending the license term until 2010. Strangely, public records indicate the license is not effective until October 1, 2006, and there is no other active license listed on the website. Previously, according to a saved copy of the web page, Carthage Palace's license was set to expire on Sept. 30 2006. How did a business with the wrong name on the license, whose licensee is no longer associated with the premesis, get a license renewal?

According to New York State law and Manhattan Community Board 3, a "license transfer hearing" is required before a liquor license may change hands among businesses, or be used to operate by anyone other than the original licensee. According to publicly available records, no such transfer hearing has ever taken place.

When asked by a local resident to comment on the ownership and licenseing of Carne Vale, Markus Jacob responded, "we are Carthage Palace." However, according to the bankruptcy documents provided to me by a loyal friend of Eater, Carthage Palace ceased to exist. Legally, I'm not sure what would happen to its license, but without proper transfer, it's extremely likely that Carne Vale is operating on a license that belongs to a non-existent company, in the name of a person who does not own or operate the business.

 I'm not a liquor license expert, nor am I trying to indicte Carne Vale. I like bars. I like nightlife. Maybe not Carne Vale or Le Souk's scene, but hey, if they follow the laws, keep the stereo below 120dB, and keep their patrons from being menaces to the 'hood, I respect their right to do business. It's when they don't do those things that this kind of scrutiny is needed.

When a bar sets up shop in New York City, it's expected they've met the legal requirements for operating. If there's a complaint against the business, who gets it, the phantom Borhane B Cherif? An underage drinking lawsuit or DUI? Etc. There's a reason the right names have to be on the license, isn't there? And a reason one business can't just go bankrupt and have a different company swoop in and take over that license without any sort of notification to the community or the state.

So, to answer these questions, I'm going to turn to a few sources, and hopefully they'll comment here or I will post their comments on the situation. I'm going to email, for comments:

  • Susan Stetzer, CB3 manager, to find out what if any notification she's had about Carne Vale and their license applications/renewals/transfers.
  • The New York State Liquor Authority Public/Press Relations address, for comments on the legality of Carne Vale's operation and why their license says Carthage Palace
  •  Hopefully, Markus Yacob, to clarify what he means when he says "we are Carthage Palace."

Lastly, I'm going to try to find Borhane B Cherif, where or who ever he may be. Borhane? Borhane? Anyone?

Definitely more to come on this one.

The New Old Yankee Stadium

So, it finally happened today. After fits and starts, stadium plans in Manhattan and New Jersey, and more than a decade of bickering, an ailing Steinbrenner scooped a shovel full of ceremonial dirt to show that the new Yankee Stadium, meant to be a replica of the old, original one, will soon start to rise. Yankees Will Break Ground for Their New Stadium - New York Times

I have mixed feelings about this whole thing. As a kid, as a Yankees fan, it was indoctrinated into me that Yankee Stadium was living baseball history. In fact, when I was growing up, the Yankees went through some rather lean years. We had Donnie Baseball, but Reggie left, Thurman died, Billy Martin was fired, Billy Martin was fired, and did I mention that Billy Martin was fired? So yes, the Yankees were a historically great team, and I don’t expect anyone to shed tears for my fandom, but it’s not like they were hoisting pennants while I was a kid. All I had was other people’s memories, and that park in the Bronx.

Being a Jersey brat, with parents that thought baseball was for lazy Americans, I was left to my own devices to attend games. Luckily, a few of the churches in town sponsored bus trips to games once or twice a summer. For $10 (later $20) we got round trip bus service, bleacher tickets, (sometimes Tier Reserved), and a three block walk through the war-torn Bronx (that would be the drug war) to the safe haven of the maddening Stadium crowds milling about River Avenue. The rest of the time, it was up to Phil Rizzuto on Channel 9 to keep me up to date on the game, and uh, whatever else was on his mind.

Then Steinbrenner got banned. For 3 years, he couldn’t touch the team. Three years during which we didn’t trade away prospects named Rivera, Williams, Jeter, Posada for guys named Ken Phelps. We finally had a farm system that hadn’t been pillaged for the Aging Slugger’s Pension Fund. We had manager, Buck Showalter, who was kind of dictatorial and mean, who managed to get the best out of a bunch of pretty spoiled athletes, while also alienating everyone around. Little did we know your team could pre-order World Series rings the day he quit or got fired. In ‘96, with Mattingly retired too early (my heart still breaks for him), we promoted the kids, hired a nice guy manager, and the run started.

Many people have written better accounts of that period, from 96-9/10/01, when we were invincible. I won’t try to add to their brilliance. But the points is, Yankee Stadium was alive again.

Today, it died. The new Yankee Stadium plans look alot like the original, before the renovation in the 70’s, when the Yanks played at Shea for two years. That’s cool. It will be a modern ballpark in an antique shell. That’s cool. It will have 10,000 less seats. That’s not cool. More luxury boxes– again, not cool. Tickets will be more expensive. Not cool. Parkland will be destroyed. The replacement parkland, though greater in acreage, will be on top of parking garages and in nooks, not wide open space like the current Macombs Dam park. Not cool.

As far as personal experience, the current Stadium, and I say this as a fan and half-season ticket plan owner, is awful. The crowds are dense and the flow around the park is badly designed. A full half of the Stadium promenade is closed to the public, thanks to lack of underground parking for players, camera trucks and crew. That means 50,000 people are squeezed into a plaza that could maybe hold 10,000 comfortably, which in turns squeezes everyone out to River Ave. Entrances are badly designed, security tries to be efficient, but invariably you feel like a hog in a chute. It makes no sense that there are 15 ticket checkers for 5 or 6 screeners. Those numbers should be reversed, since the ticket guy is just holding a scanner, but screeners have to inspect each fan before they can pass. The halls around the seats are practically catacombs. Narrow, low ceilings, claustrophobic, even when you can see the field from the doorways. The ramps inside are all hairpin turns causing pile-ups after every game. The place is basically a deathtrap.

But, another renovation could make it a thing of beauty and preserve the parkland, and preserve the fact that Ruth, Gehrig, Dimaggio, Mantle, Munson, Berra, etc., played there, on that field, in that park. After this Stadium is gone, Wrigley and Fenway will be all that links us back to the turn of the century, back to the original shrines of baseball.

The renovations I’d like to see though, are too minor in scale. Take down the outside wall, expand halls and aisles. Get rid of the stupid floating yellow step that makes getting around the Tier a nightmare. Create a ticketed outdoor area and an underground tunnel to the player’s lot so the whole damn side of the park doesn’t have to be closed off. The problem is, none of this does anything for revenue.

The new park will have fewer seats, increasing scarcity and prices, and more luxury boxes, creating whole classes of fans who will never have to wait in line for a hot dog or even watch the game in front of them, if they’d rather sit in the back of the suite and watch on the plasma tv. We fans broke attendance records every year for the past 10 years so that Steinbrenner could build a new park with ten thousand less seats? Please George, pay someone to dig up dirt on Gary Sheffield. The guy is filthy, and it’s obvious we could use another ban, although I guess it’s too late. Anyway, at this point, Steinbrenner is the Queen Elizabeth team figurehead– his son in law, Steve Swindal [great name] is the Vaseline in this act of penetration.

Yankee Stadium needs an update. But slapping an old facade on a brand new Stadium that will cater to the wealthy is nothing short of despicable. For me, going to a basketball game is out. I can’t spend $100 to sit in the rafters and watch the Knicks suck. Hockey? Never heard of it. Baseball is the egalitarian sport of my youth. The sport where any kid, with a little luck, could at least hit one good home run ball, once, even if they weren’t a good athlete, and think, for a second, that they were Donnie Baseball, George Brett, Kirk Gibson, because they could pay $3 or $5 to see them in person. The danger of getting to Yankee Stadium as a kid made it all the more welcoming (in a really strange way) once you finally got there. Though I don’t miss the danger, I do wonder who the new Stadium will be welcoming once it’s open. Kids from Jersey, at least my town, can’t afford $80 bus trips to the Bronx.

Sometimes it just hits you…

The Real (Fake) Message

I’m not sure why, but reading the NYT story on the Bush signing the tax cut relief just kind of flipped a switch in my head. I knew right away the picture posted along with the article was just not telling the whole story.
For example: “[Democrats] say the tax cuts favor the wealthy and even oil companies while letting languish Senate-passed tax breaks on college tuition and state and local sales taxes, as well as a research-and-development tax credit for businesses. Each expired in December.”

Yes, glad we got those “tax cuts” in place.